In a recent episode of his popular podcast, The Jim Cornette Experience, the wrestling legend turned commentator, Jim Cornette, expressed his frustration with AEW’s (All Elite Wrestling) title scene. Cornette, a pioneer in the world of professional wrestling, has witnessed the industry evolve over the years, but even he’s perplexed by AEW’s approach to championships.
AEW’s Over-Saturation of Titles
AEW has been criticized for its extensive use of championships, with multiple titles being defended on a regular basis. While this may seem appealing to some, Cornette believes it has led to a dilution of the championships’ value. According to Cornette, the abundance of titles has resulted in a lack of significance, making each belt feel less prestigious.
“It’s like they’re throwing titles around like they’re candy,” Cornette said. “Everybody’s got a belt, but nobody knows what it means. The championships used to be a big deal, but now they’re just a bunch of guys walking around with belts on, and nobody really cares.”
The Impact on Wrestlers and Storylines
The over-saturation of titles has also had a negative impact on the wrestlers and storylines. With so many championships available, wrestlers are often left with a lack of direction and purpose. Cornette believes this has resulted in a decrease in the overall quality of matches and storylines, as wrestlers are not being challenged to reach their full potential.
“When you’ve got so many titles floating around, it’s hard to create compelling storylines,” Cornette explained. “The wrestlers are just going through the motions, defending their belts and not really having to earn it. It’s a lazy way to book a show, and it’s ultimately hurting the product.”
AEW’s Response to Criticism
AEW has yet to respond to Cornette’s criticism, but sources close to the company claim that they are aware of the issue and are working to address it. According to sources, AEW is considering a revamp of their title scene, potentially introducing new championships or restructuring the existing ones.
“We’re aware of the criticism, and we’re taking it seriously,” a source close to AEW revealed. “We’re always looking for ways to improve and make our product better. We’ll be making some changes soon, but we can’t comment on what those changes will be just yet.”
WWE’s Approach to Titles
In contrast, WWE has taken a more traditional approach to championships, with a focus on a select few titles. This approach has allowed WWE to build a strong, cohesive title scene, with each belt having a clear significance and purpose. According to sources close to WWE, the company is happy to see AEW struggling with their title scene.
“WWE has always been about quality over quantity,” a source close to WWE revealed. “We focus on a select few titles, and we make sure each belt means something. It’s not about throwing titles around; it’s about creating a sense of value and significance.”
Conclusion
Jim Cornette’s criticism of AEW’s title scene has sparked a debate within the professional wrestling community. While some may argue that AEW’s approach to championships is innovative and exciting, others see it as a lazy way to book a show. As AEW continues to navigate the challenges of their title scene, one thing is clear: the championships are a crucial aspect of any wrestling promotion, and getting it right is essential to building a successful and engaging product.
[Image: Jim Cornette speaking at a wrestling event]
Recommended Reading:
- “The Impact of AEW’s Title Scene on Wrestlers and Storylines”
- “WWE’s Approach to Championships: A Model for Sustainability”
- “The Pros and Cons of AEW’s Over-Saturation of Titles”